Legal Opinion
Overlake Hospital Ass'n v. Department of Health
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 2010No. 82728-1PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
¶1 Swedish Health Services (Swedish) and the Washington State Department of Health (Department) seek review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, in which that court concluded that the Department used flawed methodology in determining that there was need for an additional ambulatory surgical facility (ASF) in East King County.1 Swedish and the Department’s principal argument is that the Court of Appeals did not accord sufficient deference to the Department’s interpretation of the regulatory language relating to the process for obtaining a certificate of need. We agree with Swedish and the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Safeco Insurance v. MeyeringWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Olympia v. DrebickWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. DalmanWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Olympia v. DrebickWashington Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital v. Washington State Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Whatcom County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Bravern Residential II, LLC v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Charles Peiffer v. Pro-Cut Concrete Cutting and Breaking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- STATE DEPT. OF ECOLOGY v. Tiger Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.