Legal Opinion

Redeford v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1977No. 9478PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, J.:

Earl Lenon Redeford appeals from a conviction by jury for attempted burglary contending: (1) the district court erred in giving a coercive jury instruction; (2) a statutory presumption created by the legislature for burglary prosecutions is unconstitutional; and (3) the district court erred by admitting evidence of a prior felony conviction. Appellant’s initial contention has merit, and we must reverse.

1. At the close of evidence the trial court read a standard jury instruction which discussed the deliberation process. 1 The jury then retired, deliberated…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. John Fioravanti, Nicholas Panaccione, and Angelo Pepe, Nicholas PanaccioneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  5. Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Givens v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Carr v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. White v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Brinkman v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Farmer v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API