Legal Opinion

In re Chapman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 8, 1986No. 86-042PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

(with whom Souter and Johnson, JJ., concur). The petitioner, William L. Chapman, Esq., invokes the original jurisdiction of this court, Sup. Ct. R. 11, in requesting an order directing the New Hampshire Bar Association (the Association) to comply with the terms of its constitution and with the limitations as to its legislative activities placed upon it by In re Unification of the New Hampshire Bar, 109 N.H. 260, 248 A.2d 709 (1968) and In re Unified New Hampshire Bar, 112 N.H. 204, 291 A.2d 600 (1972). The petitioner specifically requests that we enjoin the Association from continuing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Lathrop v. DonohueSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Konefal v. Hollis/Brookline Cooperative School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  2. Keller v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. M-Plan, Inc. v. Indiana Comprehensive Health Insurance Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re MoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  5. In re New Hampshire Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API