Keller v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROUSSARD, J.
This suit attacks the use of dues collected by the State Bar of California to finance lobbying, amicus curiae briefs and other activities, including election campaign activities, politically or ideologically objectionable to plaintiffs, Upon analysis of the constitutional status and legislative structure of the State Bar, we conclude that the State Bar may use dues to finance any activity, except election campaigning, which is germane to its statutory mission to promote “the improvement of the administration of justice.” (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6031, subd. (a).) 1
Acting…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Keller v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Vargas v. City of SalinasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Benjamin Kohn v. State Bar of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Schneider v. Colegio de Abogados de Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.