Legal Opinion
Isenhower v. Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided March 11, 2004No. Civil Action 03-F-566-NPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FULLER, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Application or Motion to Modify Arbitration Award to Provide for Attorney’s Fees, Costs and Interest (Doc. # 1). Colonel and Mrs. George G. Isenhower (hereinafter “Plaintiffs” or “the Isenhow-ers”) seek modifications of an arbitration award issued by an arbitration panel after hearing Plaintiffs’ claims that Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. (hereinafter “Defendant” or Morgan Keegan”) violated the Alabama Securities Act and federal securities laws. Defendant opposes the modifications of the award…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Aubie BALTIN; Gwilda Baltin, Plaintiffs-Appellants. v. ALARON TRADING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- O.R. Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robert W. Baird & Co. v. Sunamerica Securities, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
- Kostoff v. Fleet Securities, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007