Legal Opinion

West v. Katsafanas

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1932No. Appeal 41PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldbige, J.,

This appeal is from a judgment obtained by the plaintiff in an action of assumpsit brought by him to recover damages from the defendant for a breach of an implied warranty.

On October 27, 1927, the plaintiff ordered from the defendant, a restaurant keeper, a pork sandwich, pie and coffee. After eating a portion of the sandwich, which proved to be not palatable, he became so ill that it was necessary for him to be taken to the hospital, where his symptoms showed that he was suffering from poisoning.

The questions to be considered in this appeal are: (1) Was there a sale;…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Race v. . KrumNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Farrell v. Manhattan Market Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Catani v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Nock v. Coca Cola Bot. Wks. Pgh.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Henderson v. National Drug Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Cliett v. Lauderdale Biltmore CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  3. Madden Et Ux. v. Great A. P. Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Stanfield ex rel. Stanfield v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. McCarley v. Wood Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API