Mark Steven Van Buskirk v. George H. Baldwin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed June 28, 2001 in the above matter, No. 00-35640, and appearing at 255 F.3d 974, 977 (9th Cir.2001), is amended as follows:
1)Slip op. at 8205, lines 11-15; 255 F.3d at 977, lines 41-48 delete:
The first half of the question is whether the Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) standard for testing the adequacy of representation is trumped by the actual innocence claim propped up by the newly discovered expert testimony
Replace with:
The first half of the question is whether the expert testimony provided by Van Buskirk is newly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
3Cited by38 opinions
- Young v. GipsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Osumi v. GiurbinoDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- (HC) Ellis v. Warden of Central California Women's FacilityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (HC) Haynie v. CatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (HC) Haynie v. CatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.