Legal Opinion

Young v. Gipson

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 11, 2015No. Case No. 11-cv-04985-JST (PR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*665ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge

Before the Court is the above-titled petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by petitioner Robert Young, challenging the validity of a judgment obtained against him in state court. Respondent has filed an answer to the petition, and petitioner has filed a traverse. For the reasons set forth below, the petition is granted in part and denied in part.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On October 17, 1990, in a capital case trial, an Alameda County Superior…

2Cases cited232 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

227 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. George Clark v. Noah NagyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. In re ManriquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. (HC) Yocom v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  4. Scott v. CatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  5. Stepan Sereda v. Manuel Ayala, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API