Legal Opinion

(HC) Haynie v. Cates

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 7, 2024No. 2:19-cv-01967Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONELL THOMAS HAYNIE, No. 2:19-cv-01967 KJM AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 BRIAN CATES, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Donell Thomas Haynie, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed his original 18 petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this case in 2019. See Pet., ECF No. 1; First Am. Pet., ECF 19 No. 18. He asserted a single claim under the Sixth Amendment: he contended he had been 20 wrongfully deprived of a jury trial when the state court, rather than a jury, decided he had 21…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Nunez v. City Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Mark Steven Van Buskirk v. George H. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API