Legal Opinion

Hensley v. Industrial Maintenance Overflow

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 21, 2004No. COA03-1140PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

In this appeal from an Opinion and Award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission, defendants Industrial Maintenance Overflow (“Industrial”) and Industrial’s insurance carrier, the PMA Insurance Group, challenge the Commission’s conclusion that plaintiff Roy Ronald Hensley is totally disabled. Defendants contend Mr. Hensley’s income from a tobacco allotment and ownership of a mobile home park established that he is only partially disabled. Because the Commission made the findings of fact required by Lanning v. Fieldcrest-Cannon, Inc., 352 N.C. 98, 107-08, 530 S.E.2d 54, 61…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Deese v. Champion International Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Johnson v. Southern Tire Sales and ServiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Bryant v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Perkins v. U.S. AirwaysCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Greene v. Conlon Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Huffman v. Moore CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Bolling v. B K Well Drilling, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2005
  5. Gillette v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API