United States v. Bartell
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
We are called upon to decide whether a servicemember may be prosecuted for refusing to obey a lawful general order where the order has been signed by a subordinate staff member rather than by the *296commanding general himself.1 Art. 92(1), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892(1); see United States v. Breault, 30 MJ 833 (NMCMR 1990). We hold that Article 92(1) requires only that the order be issued as a result of the personal decision of a general officer.2 How the order is communicated to the subordinate members of the affected command is a matter of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. HarrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. BreaultU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. WebsterU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. CorcoranUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.