Legal Opinion

United States v. Bartell

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 15, 1991No. 65,073; NMCM 89-2560PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

We are called upon to decide whether a servicemember may be prosecuted for refusing to obey a lawful general order where the order has been signed by a subordinate staff member rather than by the *296commanding general himself.1 Art. 92(1), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892(1); see United States v. Breault, 30 MJ 833 (NMCMR 1990). We hold that Article 92(1) requires only that the order be issued as a result of the personal decision of a general officer.2 How the order is communicated to the subordinate members of the affected command is a matter of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. BreaultU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. RoaneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. WebsterU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  5. United States v. CorcoranUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API