Legal Opinion

Ozark Natural Food v. Pierson

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 8, 2012No. CA 11-939PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFF HOOFMAN, Judge.

|!Appellants Ozark Natural Food and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company appeal from the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission’s (Commission) decision, affirming and adopting the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), that appellee Leah Pierson sustained a compensable aggravation of her preexisting cervical spine problems as a result of her work injury and that she is entitled to reasonably necessary medical treatment related to this injury. On appeal, appellants argue that the Commission’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.

Pierson,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Con-Agra Frozen FoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Evans v. Bemis Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  3. Heptinstall v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Hernandez v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Grothaus v. Vista Health, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. J.B. Hunt Transport Services Inc. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Edmisten v. Bull Shoals LandingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Greene County Judge and Association of Arkansas Counties Risk Management Services v. Rick L. PennyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Hopkins v. Harness Roofing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Hill v. TreadawayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API