Legal Opinion

Gainey v. Folkman

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided July 14, 1953No. Civ. 1859PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANKW1CH, Chief Judge.

By his complaint, the plaintiff .seeks to recover damages for injury to his cattle and injunctive relief against further “dusting” of cotton on the defendant’s ranch, which lies across a road from plaintiff’s ranch. It is his contention that the dusting has caused some of the alfalfa on his ranch to become impregnated. As some of the cattle graze on this alfalfa and other cut alfalfa is fed to them, it is insisted by the plaintiff that the poisoning from such impregnation is responsible for the “unthrifty” condition of his herd. This condition appeared only after the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Bohan v. Port Jervis Gaslight Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Standard Brands, Inc. v. ZumpeDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. HarangDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1966
  3. Farnsworth v. HubbardArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Kell v. Appalachian Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Grace & Co. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API