Legal Opinion
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Harang
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided December 19, 1966No. 66-697PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUBIN, District Judge.
At the start of this litigation, the plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction to prevent one of the defendants, Jack F. Harang, from destroying “any document, record, check, map or writing relating to” certain transactions entered into by Harang or by a corporation which he is alleged to control.
The complaint alleges that Harang or other persons acting at his command or urging will conceal, destroy, or otherwise place these documents beyond the reach of the court unless enjoined from doing so. It supports this allegation by an affidavit of one of the lawyers for the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Congress of Racial Equality v. DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- The Frostie Company v. Dr. Pepper Company, Dr. Pepper Company v. The Frostie CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Board of Education of Greene County, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Williams v. Pelican CreameryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
- Blease v. Safety Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Matos Ex Rel. Matos v. Clinton School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Marshall Durbin Farms, Inc. v. National Farmers Organization, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Treppel v. Biovail Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Pueblo of Laguna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Capricorn Power Co. v. Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.