General Electric Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
These three consolidated cases present the following question: Should corporate taxpayers who elect to file a combined Massachusetts tax return under G. L. c. 63, § 32B, first combine their net incomes, then adjust that sum under G. L. c. 63, § 38 (a), to arrive at the group’s taxable net income and, lastly, apportion the group ’ s taxable net income to Massachusetts by using a combined apportionment factor, or should they first separately determine and apportion the taxable net income of each affiliated corporation, -and then combine those sums to arrive at the group’s income taxable in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Polaroid Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Xtra, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- State Tax Commission v. La Touraine Coffee Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Walter Kidde & Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Risk Management Foundation of Harvard Medical Institutions, Inc. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Tilcon Massachusetts, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
- Morey v. MARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMISSIONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- New York Times Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Farrell Enterprises, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.