Legal Opinion

General Electric Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 9, 1988PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

These three consolidated cases present the following question: Should corporate taxpayers who elect to file a combined Massachusetts tax return under G. L. c. 63, § 32B, first combine their net incomes, then adjust that sum under G. L. c. 63, § 38 (a), to arrive at the group’s taxable net income and, lastly, apportion the group ’ s taxable net income to Massachusetts by using a combined apportionment factor, or should they first separately determine and apportion the taxable net income of each affiliated corporation, -and then combine those sums to arrive at the group’s income taxable in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Polaroid Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Xtra, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. State Tax Commission v. La Touraine Coffee Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Walter Kidde & Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Risk Management Foundation of Harvard Medical Institutions, Inc. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Tilcon Massachusetts, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. Morey v. MARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMISSIONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. New York Times Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Farrell Enterprises, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API