Legal Opinion

Polaroid Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 11, 1984PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

Polaroid Corporation (Polaroid) and its subsidiaries have conducted a unitary business in the United States and in numerous foreign countries for the purpose of the design, manufacture, and marketing of a variety of products, primarily in the field of photography. Well after the plaintiffs had filed their corporate excise returns for the years 1979 and 1980, the Commissioner of Revenue (commissioner) 2 redetermined their corporate excises for those years based on a worldwide unitary apportionment of the combined income of Polaroid and its various subsidiaries. In September, 1983, he made…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Andover Savings Bank v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Kellogg Co. v. HerringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. CBS Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Suffolk Construction Co. v. Division of Capital Asset ManagementMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. RahimMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. State, Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API