Polaroid Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
Polaroid Corporation (Polaroid) and its subsidiaries have conducted a unitary business in the United States and in numerous foreign countries for the purpose of the design, manufacture, and marketing of a variety of products, primarily in the field of photography. Well after the plaintiffs had filed their corporate excise returns for the years 1979 and 1980, the Commissioner of Revenue (commissioner) 2 redetermined their corporate excises for those years based on a worldwide unitary apportionment of the combined income of Polaroid and its various subsidiaries. In September, 1983, he made…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franklin v. AlbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Andover Savings Bank v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Kellogg Co. v. HerringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- CBS Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Suffolk Construction Co. v. Division of Capital Asset ManagementMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. RahimMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. State, Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.