Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Tuckerman

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.

The only question presented is as to whether the estate of the deceased trustee (Paul Tuckerman) and the surviving trustee (Bank of New York) are each entitled to a full commission.

There has been no judicial accounting since one filed by the original executors and trustees running to April 9, 1917, which was judicially settled by a decree made in the New York County Surrogate’s Court on June 21,1917.

The original inventory of the principal of the trust as shown by schedule A, part 1, of the account (it is stated in objeetants’ brief) was $75,021.04. This was the amount received by the trustees…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WitkindNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  2. In re the Estate of MohrNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  3. In re the Estate of PrattNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  4. In re the Estate of EdwardsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
  5. In re the Estate of CorningNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. In re the Estate of MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API