Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Corning

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 11, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, S.

The problems presented may be very simply stated, and it would seem that in larger estates they must be of more or less daily occurrence, yet painstaking and diligent research on the part of counsel, as well as the efforts of the surrogate, have failed to disclose any existing pertinent authority.

The first question for determination is with respect to claimed commissions upon alleged increment in the corpus of the different trusts involved. To take the figures from one of the trusts, it appears that there was an increase' in the corpus arising from sales, redemptions and collections…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Collier v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Beard v. . BeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. In Re the Accounting of Mercantile Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. In re Hayden's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of PrattNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  2. In re the Estate of NelsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1980
  3. In re the Estate of WilsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. In re the Accounting of TuckermanNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  5. In re the Estate of StillmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API