Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Mohr

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 22, 1938PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

An intermediate accounting is here made by a surviving trustee and by the representatives of a deceased trustee. The latter seek in behalf of their testator the allowance to his estate of a full commission.

The deceased trustee was appointed on February 29, 1916, at a time when the principal value of the trust amounted to $92,913.71. He died on April 14,1936. In the twenty years intervening between appointment and death "the only realized increases of capital value amounted to $2,191.91, as shown in Schedule A-l of the account. Offsetting this increase in part is a capital loss of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Robertson v. . De BrulatourNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. In Re the Accounting of BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. In Re the Accounting of BusheNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. In Re the Accounting of Chemical Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Phoenix v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Larkin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  2. In re the Accounting of GilchristNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In re the Estate of JuilliardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  4. In re the Estate of BourneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
  5. In re the Estate of McGrathNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API