Legal Opinion
Marco Corona-Contreras v. Steven Gruel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 2017No. 15-16783PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTGOMERY, District Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellee Marco Antonio Corona-Contreras (“Contreras”) sued Defendant-Appellant Steven Gruel (“Gruel”) in California state court for, among other things, breach of contract and legal malpractice. Eleven months later, Gruel removed the case to federal court on the basis of diversity and federal question jurisdiction. Contreras did not object to the removal or file a motion to remand. More than three months after the case had been removed, the district court sua sponte found the removal to be untimely and remanded the case back to state court. Gruel…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kelton Arms Condominium Owners Association, Inc. v. Homestead Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Robert H. Harris v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company Kenneth L. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Emma C. Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Jack Fristoe v. Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Andrew Smith v. Mylan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Vinod Sharma v. Hsi Asset Loan Obligation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Fidelitad, Inc. v. Insitu, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Lauren Casola v. Dexcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Kris Kenny v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Mary Riggs v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.