Legal Opinion

Fidelitad, Inc. v. Insitu, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 25, 2018No. 17-35162PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURWITZ, Circuit Judge:

Insitu, Inc. designs and manufactures unmanned aerial systems-commonly known as "drones"-that it sells to military and civilian customers. Fidelitad, Inc. is a value-added reseller of Insitu's drones in Latin America. In this action, Fidelitad claims that Insitu improperly delayed shipment of its orders, wrongfully terminated a purported distributorship agreement, and then moved into the Latin American market, appropriating Fidelitad's prior groundwork.

Fidelitad filed its original complaint in Washington state court. Insitu removed the action to the United States…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Watson v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Arizona v. ManypennySupreme Court of the United States · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Jackie Saldana v. Glenhaven Healthcare LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  2. County of San Mateo v. Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. Kenneth Lake v. Ohana Military CommunitiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. Hus Buljic v. Tyson Foods IncCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. Dwight Stirling v. Larry MinasianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API