In Re Tokhmanian
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
A prisoner serving an indeterminate life term for murder was granted parole by a parole consideration panel (the panel). Concluding that a procedural error took place at the hearing before the panel, the Board of Parole Hearings (the board) disapproved the panel’s decision, and directed that a new parole hearing be scheduled. The prisoner sought relief from the board’s decision by means of a petition for habeas corpus. Concluding that the board’s decision was in error, the trial court vacated the board’s decision granting rehearing and reinstated the panel’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re ArafilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Helene Curtis, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Assessment Appeals BoardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- In re LiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- In Re MasonerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- In Re PratherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Martinez v. MarshallDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010