Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Marshall

District Court, C.D. California

Decided June 18, 2010No. Case CV 06-7131-DDP (RC)Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the petition and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, as well as respondent’s Objections, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; (3) the Court determines petitioner was denied…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API