Legal Opinion

In re Lira

California Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2014No. S204582PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

A life inmate is found suitable for parole and given a parole date by the Board of Parole Hearings (the Board). The Governor reverses the grant of parole, the inmate challenges the reversal by petition for writ of habeas corpus, and while the petition is pending the Board again finds the inmate suitable and sets another parole date. The Governor does not review the second decision, and the inmate is released from prison, subject to a maximum five-year parole term under the applicable statute. If the court subsequently grants relief on the inmate’s habeas corpus petition and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Swarthout v. CookeSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. EspinozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. In re TrejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. In re PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  4. People v. VonWahldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. In re ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API