Legal Opinion
Martin v. Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 9, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peb Ctjbiam.
The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Justice Brogden not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, as the disposition of this appeal, without becoming a precedent, in accordance with the practice of the Court. See Trust Co. v. Hood, 207 N. C., 862, 177 S. E., 16.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Trust Co v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Collins v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Collins v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Wells v. . WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942