Legal Opinion

State v. Burnette

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1955No. 435Published

1Opinion of the Court

87 S.E.2d 191 (1955)

242 N.C. 164

STATE of North Carolina

v.

Bernice Lee BURNETTE.

No. 435.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 1955.

Harry McMullan, Atty. Gen., and Ralph Moody, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Taylor & Mitchell, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

PARKER, Justice.

We have here for determination (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to carry the case to the jury, and (2) the adequacy and correctness of the charge.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the court to sustain his motion for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of the State's case, the defendant offered no evidence,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. State v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API