Legal Opinion
Rifkin v. Achermann
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1996No. A069418PublishedCited by 3 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SWAGER, J.
This extended litigation reaches us for a second time on appeal. We remand the case for two minor modifications in the judgment—a recalculation of interest and the deletion of one item of costs—and otherwise affirm the judgment.
I. Facts and Procedural History
The dispute arises from a standard real estate sales agreement in which Marcel and Adelheid Achermann (hereafter the Achermanns) agreed to sell their former residence in Marin County to Harvey Rifkin (hereafter Rifkin) at a closing set for June 15, 1988. A week after the scheduled closing, on June 22, 1988, Rifkin filed a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palos Verdes Faculty Ass'n v. Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Kizer v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Caplan v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Abrams v. MotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reese v. Hung Kim WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Lewis C. Nelson & Sons, Inc. v. Clovis Unified Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Lewis C. Nelson & Sons, Inc. v. Clovis Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001