Legal Opinion

Labar v. Crane

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. Case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is an action for malicious prosecution. The salient facts are that in October, 1879, the defendant Crane instituted a prosecution of the plaintiff before a justice of the peace of Kalamazoo, charging him with making an assault upon complainant with a gun, with intent to murder ; that plaintiff was arrested upon this charge, but after a continuance of the case for a time, the complaint was withdrawn and one for simple assault and battery substituted,, upon which plaintiff was tried and convicted; that plaintiff appealed the case to the circuit court, where he was tried and acquitted; that…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Labar v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Coghlan v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Taylor v. RiceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API