Legal Opinion

Sieverding v. Colorado Bar Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 14, 2006No. 06-1038PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

Kay Sieverding, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s order imposing filing restrictions. We affirm the district court’s imposition of filing restrictions, but we conclude that a portion of the order must be modified.

Background

Ms. Sieverding, her husband, and two sons filed a complaint in the District of Colorado in October 2002. The complaint was 106 pages long and set forth claims against thirty-six individuals or entities. The underlying issue in the case related to the alleged violation of the Sieverdings’ rights with regard to zoning decisions that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Anant Kumar Tripati v. William C. BeamanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  3. Cotner v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. Martin-Trigona v. LavienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Abdus-Samad v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Baum v. Blue Moon Ventures, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. Ford v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Lundahl v. HalabiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. In re MeltzerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  5. Larry Klayman v. Julia PorterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API