Grimm v. Venezia
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Muse, Christopher J., J.
INTRODUCTION
Susan Grimm (“Grimm”) and David Mason (“Mason”) seek summary judgment on their claim for the return of deposit under a contingency clause of Rider A of the Purchase and Sales Agreement, which they entered with the defendant Anne Venezia (“Venezia”) and summary judgment on counterclaims. Venezia also moves for summary judgment on her claim for the deposit, and on her counterclaims of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fraud in the inducement. For reasons stated below, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED and defendant’s motion is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gerson Realty Inc. v. CasalyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Professional Economics, Inc. v. Professional Economic Services, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- McMann v. McGowanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Korey v. SheffMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- BayBank v. GeorgeMassachusetts Superior Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cutter Associates, Inc. v. SeemanMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013