Legal Opinion
Korey v. Sheff
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided May 15, 1975PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
This is an action in summary process and for damages. In the Superior Court, the judge, sitting without a jury, found that the defendants (tenants) had timely exercised an option to renew pursuant to the then current lease and were lawfully in possession for a new five year term at the rent provided for the renewal period.
The plaintiffs (landlords) argue that the judge committed error in making his findings and rulings, and in denying their motions for a finding for the plaintiffs, for a new trial, and to reopen the trial. Exceptions claimed by the plaintiffs, but not argued in their brief,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dynamics Corporation of America, as Successor in Interest to International Fermont, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Wrobel v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Commonwealth v. HassanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Marston v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Osprey L.L.C v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Fletcher v. FrisbeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Western Tire, Inc. v. SkredeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Getty Refining and Marketing Co. v. ZwiebelDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.