Tenczar v. Tenczar
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The petitioner is the respondent’s wife. By this petition she asks that a “specific account” which had been in the husband’s name in Fall River National Bank should “be declared to have been the- result of the joint efforts of the parties and should be shared equally by them.” The decree declared that the money in the account “was owned” by them “as tenants in common,” and ordered the respondent, who before the date of the petition had closed the account by withdrawing $4,145.48, “to deliver” to the petitioner “the sum of $2,072.74, which is one half of the money so jointly accumulated by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Druker v. DrukerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Moat v. MoatMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Cram v. CramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Sidlow v. GosselinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Druker v. DrukerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Campagna v. CampagnaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Paone v. GerrigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Ross v. RossMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
- Reed v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Hutchinson v. HutchinsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.