Legal Opinion

Moat v. Moat

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 28, 1938PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiff is the husband of the defendant Maude T. Moat. The primary purpose of the bill is to establish and enforce against Maude T. Moat and against the defendant Levy as the conservator of her property an alleged resulting trust in the real estate known as the Bernardston Inn in Bernardston, together with the personal property pertaining thereto. The defendants Maude T. Moat and Levy appeal from an interlocutory decree overruling their exceptions to the master’s report and confirming the report and from a final decree for the plaintiff. Their further attempt to appeal from an order for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McDonough v. O'NielMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Graustein v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Davis v. DownerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Quinn v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Pollock v. PollockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Berry v. KyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Jackson v. HernandezTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Druker v. DrukerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Collins v. CurtinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Exchange Realty Co. v. BinesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API