Legal Opinion
Paone v. Gerrig
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 5, 1973PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The respondents challenge the amount of the fees allowed to the petitioner Paone (Paone) for his services as special administrator and administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Helen Gerrig and the amount of the fees allowed to Paone’s counsel, Mr. Francis H. Farrell (Farrell). The respondents are Mr. Burton W. Gerrig, who is now co-administrator with the will annexed, the decedent’s husband Morris Gerrig (Gerrig) and the guardian of Beverly R. O’Hara, the daughter of a sister of the decedent. The decedent’s will, executed under her maiden name after her marriage to Gerrig, gave…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cummings v. National Shawmut Bank of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Condon v. HaitsmaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Lewis v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- McMahon v. KrapfMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Vergnani v. VergnaniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Northern Heel Corp. v. Compo Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- First National Bank of Boston v. BrinkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Bruno v. BrunoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Chase v. PevearMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Western Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Sambo's of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.