Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown, A., Aplt. v. Wetzel, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 2018No. 125 MAP 2016Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING STATEMENT

JUSTICE WECHT

I respectfully dissent.

As a prisoner, Alton D. Brown necessarily has lost those privileges of citizenship that are fundamentally incompatible with his incarceration. Nonetheless, inmates detain certain inalienáble rights! including the right to dué process and thé right to the equal protection of our laws. See Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 523, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984) (noting that prisoners retain “those rights not fundamentally inconsistent with imprisonment itself or incompatible with the objectives of incarceration,” including the rights to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API