Legal Opinion

People v. Rymut

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 30, 1991No. 2-90-0737PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woodward

Defendant, David Rymut, appeals from an order entered by the trial court which modified his terms of probation. The trial court found that defendant was not entitled to a good behavior allowance credit pursuant to section 32 of the County Jail Good Behavior Allowance Act (Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 75, par. 32) because the victim suffered emotional distress that resulted in physical manifestations as a result of defendant’s criminal act. Defendant contends on appeal that the trial court lacked the authority to deny him a statutory good behavior allowance. Defendant also contends that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Swisher v. DuffyIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Stoermer v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. MennengaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. People v. TiptonIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. JamessonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. People v. DylakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. People v. KomesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. People v. MaynardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. People v. JamessonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API