Legal Opinion
Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 19, 2016No. 15-1536CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-award bid protest; motion for preliminary injunction; likelihood of success; discussions; FAR § 15.306; equal treatment; irreparable injury.
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LETTOW, Judge.
The Army held a competition in three phases for a contract to design, develop pro totypes of, and ultimately manufacture and supply a new armored but agile all-terrain tactical vehicle to be used in combat zones. Oshkosh Defense, LLC (“Oshkosh”) won the last phase of the competition in August 2015, and it was awarded the manufacturing contract. Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed”), a losing offeror, has filed suit…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Air Cargo Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- A.T. Kearney Public Sector and Defense Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Blue Origin Federation, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Criterion Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Harmonia Holdings Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.