Andrews v. John Church Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint, from city court of Atlanta — Judge Reid. November 21, 1906.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
1. The plaintiff in error made a motion to dismiss the writ of error, upon the ground that the assignment of error is too general to be considered by the court, and upon the further ground that the bill of exceptions does not plainly specify the decisions complained of and the errors alleged. The whole question on a motion to dismiss is whether the errors complained of are so presented as to be clearly understood by this court in determining the rights of the parties. We do not think there is any merit in the motion to dismiss. It is true that the bill of exceptions does not set forth a brief…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Trust Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Johnson v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Geiser Manufacturing Co. v. Jones & TooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- National Bank v. LeonardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Heard v. DeLoachSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Musgrove v. Luther Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Hicks v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Savannah Trust Co. v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Mason v. TerrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Quinn v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.