Legal Opinion

Konkel v. Fort

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1955No. 36,604PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant in an action for damages for false arrest and for false imprisonment.

Without a settled case plaintiff seeks upon this appeal a review of alleged errors by the trial court with respect to its charge to the jury, its denial of plaintiff’s alternative motion for judgment not withstanding the verdict or a new trial, and its granting of defendant’s motion for an amendment of the pleadings. Plaintiff further seeks to review an order of the trial court denying his motion for a settled case.

The judgment from which this appeal is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. SackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Van Slyke v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Muellenberg v. JoblinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. In Re Estate of DahnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Westling v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Swendson v. SwendsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API