Legal Opinion

Creative Copier Services v. Xerox Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided November 15, 2004No. CIV.A. 3:01CV155SRUPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

UNDERHILL, District Judge.

Creative Copier Services (“CCS”) sued Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) for illegal monopolization, violation of various state laws, and violation of the Lanham Act. Xerox moves to dismiss all claims. Though some of CCS’s allegations do not state a claim for relief, most do. Accordingly, Xerox’s motion is denied in part and granted in part.

I. Statement of Facts

In its Third Amended Complaint, CCS alleges the following facts, which are assumed to be true for purposes of this motion.

CCS and Xerox compete in the market for service of Xerox high…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doron Precision Systems, Inc. v. FAAC, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  2. Steward Health Care System, LLC v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2014
  3. Rome Ambulatory Surgical Center, LLC v. Rome Memorial Hospital, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API