Gulbranson v. Hart
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
Action by appellant by complaint in five paragraphs. The first paragraph avers that appellees are doing a general banking business, as partners, as the “Bank of DeMotte,” that they are indebted to appellant in the sum of $222.50 for money had and received by appellees for the use and benefit of appellant, which sum is due and unpaid.
The second paragraph avers that on or about June 20, 1927, appellees were partners doing a general banking business in DeMotte, Indiana, under the name of “Bank of DeMotte”; that on said date, one Harold Hockney was a patron of said bank and had a checking account…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Ashton v. ShepherdIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Engle v. Director General of RailroadsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Roberts v. Terre Haute Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mescall v. W. T. Grant Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Thompson v. City of GreencastleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- McDonald v. SwansonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Peoples Trust & Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1936
- Hamble v. BrandtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.