Legal Opinion

Hamble v. Brandt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1934No. 14,619PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridwell, P. J.

Appellant filed his complaint against the appellees seeking to recover damages because his wife had received personal injuries occassioned by negligence of the appellees, and that he had thereby sustained a loss on account of being deprived, as a result of said injuries, of her “services, society, companionship and consortium.” Appellees filed their separate and several answers in general denial to the complaint, and upon the issues thus formed the cause was submitted to a jury for trial. At the close of all the evidence the court, upon the separate and several motion of appellees, instructed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prest-O-Lite Co. v. SkeelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Knoefel v. AtkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ArnottIndiana Supreme Court · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kettner v. JayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Moslander v. Moslander's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Yellow Cab Co. v. KruszynskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Leader v. BowleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API