Legal Opinion
Pinkston v. Briley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 24, 1957No. 1889, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Acting Judge.
This started out as a suit by William K. Briley against Holiday Homes, Inc., for architectural services. Briley recovered judgment and on appeal we affirmed (subject to filing of a remittitur, which was done). Holiday Homes, Inc., v. Briley, D.C.Mun.App., 122 A.2d 229.
Now before us in two separate appeals are Pinkston, as assignee for benefit of the creditors of Holiday Homes, defendant below, and Williams, as garnishee of said defendant. Pinkston charges among other things that the trial court improperly refused him permission to appear in the case. Garnishee Williams…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Heiskell v. MozieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Holiday Homes, Inc. v. BrileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- United States ex rel. Ordmann v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Young v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Dickinson v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Inversora Murten, S.A. v. Energoprojekt Holding Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Marvins Credit, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Inversora Murten v. EnergoprojektDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009