Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Brooks

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 14, 1939No. 7274PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This was a proceeding for attachment after judgment. The trial court denied a motion for summary judgment based on alleged insufficiency of garnishee’s answer. The issue is whether the answer was so evasive as to be no answer at all. We do not think it was.

The usual written interrogatories were directed to the garnishee. She answered that she was indebted to defendant in the principal suit and that this indebtedness, in the amount of $300, had been established by stipulation filed in an equity suit between her and the defendant then pending in the District Court. The stipulation was filed as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Young v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pinkston v. BrileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Ourisman Chevrolet, Inc. v. Pohanka Service, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Seaboard Finance Co. v. RuppertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API