Legal Opinion

Inversora Murten v. Energoprojekt

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 3, 2009No. Misc. No. 2003-0073Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INVERSORA MURTEN, S.A., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Misc. Action No. 03-73 (RWR)(JMF) ) ENERGOPROJEKT HOLDING CO., ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Inversora Murten, S.A. (“Inversora”) filed a writ of attachment against an intended garnishee, the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (“JBIC”). Magistrate Judge John M. Facciola has recommended that Inversora’s writ of attachment be quashed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because JBIC and its successor organizations - - the Japan Finance Corporation (“JFC”) and the Japan…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. World Wide Minerals, Ltd. v. Republic of KazakhstanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  2. Creighton Ltd. v. Government of QatarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Melvin D. Wallace and Arthur M. LevinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  4. Practical Concepts, Inc. v. Republic of BoliviaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. Doe I v. State of IsraelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API