Legal Opinion

Peters v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 19, 1958No. C. D. 2042PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DonloN, Judge:

Plaintiff entered this importation on May 9, 1955, at the port of New York, as an original oil painting and claimed it as “free on oath” under paragraph 1807 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Affidavit on Form 3309 is required to be filed with the entry, when free entry is asserted under paragraph 1807. Some days later, on May 24, 1955, the New York collector’s office received Form 3309, form of affidavit for free duty of original paintings, engravings, drawings, sculpture, etc. This is dated May 12, 1955, it has a signature “Donald H. Peters,” but it lacks verification. It is not the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Petry Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. Vixseboxse v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. 3v, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  2. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Wilshire Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. S. Stern, Henry & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API