Legal Opinion

Koral v. Savory, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1937PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiff herein is a stockholder of Elkay Reflector Corporation. A temporary receiver of the estate and property has been appointed and has been made a party defendant with the permission of the court. In his complaint the plaintiff has sought to allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for damages caused to the corporation by the defendants, named in the complaint, other than the receiver. The plaintiff does not allege in his complaint that the defendants have invaded his personal rights of property or caused any damage to him individually. He complains of alleged wrongs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Isaac v. MarcusNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Goldberg v. MeridorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Caprer v. NussbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Riviera Congress Associates ex rel. Lewy v. YasskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Montauk U.S.A., LLC v. 148 South Emerson Associates LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API