Legal Opinion
Burgess v. Omar
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 16, 2004No. 04 Civ. 00224(LAK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves to dismiss defendants’ counterclaims, none of which rests on an independent basis of federal jurisdiction, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. She argues that none arises out of a common nucleus of operative fact with her complaint, that none therefore is within the Court’s supplemental jurisdiction, and in any case that the Court should not exercise any supplemental jurisdiction that it has.
Facts
The complaint in this case centers on plaintiffs November 2003 sale of the shares of the corporate defendants to defendant Omar. Briefly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Briarpatch Limited, L.P., Gerard F. Rubin v. Phoenix Pictures, Inc., Michael Medavoy, Geisler Roberdeau, Inc., Terence MalickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Joyce Jones, Martha L. Edwards, Lou Cooper and Vincent E. Jackson, Individually and as Class Representatives v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Kirschner v. KlemonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wisey's 1 LLC v. Nimellis Pizzeria LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- AngioScore, Inc. v. TriReme Medical, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Bronx Conservatory of Music, Inc. v. Bronx School for Music, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- RN Wellness LLC v. Essentials Hero LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Zap Cellular, Inc. v. WeintraubDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020