Legal Opinion

AngioScore, Inc. v. TriReme Medical, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided November 8, 2016No. 2016-1126, 2016-1142PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hughes, Circuit Judge.

AngioScore, Inc. sued the defendant-appellants (TriReme 'Medical, LLC, Quattro Vascular PTE Ltd., QT Vascular Ltd., and Eitan Konstantino) for patent infringement, breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting, and unfair competition. After separate trials on the patent and state-law claims, the district court entered final judgment for Defendants on the patent claim, for AngioScore on the state-law claims, and denied Corporate Defendants’ (TriReme Medical, LLC, Quattro Vascular PTE Ltd., and QT Vascular Ltd.) request for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Because we…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Jerry Palmer v. Hospital Authority Of Randolph CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Sfa Systems, LLC v. Newegg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daniel Horner, et al. v. Timney Triggers LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026
  2. Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Thales DIS AIS USA LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
  3. Miller v. Nomota, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  4. S.H. Silver Company Inc v. Sentinel Insurance Company, LimitedDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  5. Thirty Three Threads, Inc. v. Pacific Manufacturing LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API