Legal Opinion
Zap Cellular, Inc. v. Weintraub
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2020No. 1:15-cv-06723Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x ZAP CELLULAR, INC. d/b/a AMP CELLULUAR, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER 15-CV-6723 (PKC) (VMS) - against - ARI WEINTRAUB, MORTON WEINTRAUB, ESTI DRESDNER, STEVE WEINSTOCK, MAZAL TECH MEDIA, INC., Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------x PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Zap Cellular, Inc. (“Zap Cellular”) initiated this action on November 23, 2015, alleging two civil violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), 18 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.